Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Martina Trevisan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W W L W L L
Form
W W L L L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Selekhmeteva 1 - 1 Trevisan
They have played 6 sets in total, with Selekhmeteva winning 3 and Trevisan winning 3. The last match between Selekhmeteva and Trevisan was at the W80 Valencia, 18-09-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Martina Trevisan getting the victory 6-2 2-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oksana Selekhmeteva | 1 |
| Martina Trevisan | 1 |
W80 Valencia(18-09-2021)
6
2
2
6
6
2
| Selekhmeteva | Stats | Trevisan |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (12-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 161 | Ranking | 157 |
| 138 | Highest Rank | 18 |
| 22 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 3 | Titles | 12 |
| 65% (169-91) | Career Total W/L | 58% (312-222) |
| $219,263 | Career Prize Money | $2,243,283 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Selekhmeteva VS Trevisan H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Martina Trevisan
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 1-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Martina Trevisan
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Selekhmeteva VS Trevisan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 25 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:54:30 | Average Match Time | 1:54:30 |
| 66% (111/168) | 1st Serve % | 69% (102/147) |
| 68% (75/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (62/102) |
| 33% (19/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 39% (7/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (8/25) |
| 42% (62/147) | Return Points Win % | 44% (74/168) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Oksana Selekhmeteva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Tamara Zidansek
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Martina Trevisan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Martina Trevisan
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Wushuang Zheng
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Martina Trevisan
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Martina Trevisan
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Martina Trevisan
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Martina Trevisan
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
15
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Martina Trevisan
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Renata Zarazua
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Caroline Dolehide
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (169/91) | Win/Loss | 58% (312/222) |
| 62% (366/226) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (698/537) |
| 55% (3011/2493) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5981/5278) |
| 68% (55/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (66/75) |
| 67% (96/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (231/119) |
| 50% (17/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (14/17) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 8% (1/11) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 293 | Aces Total | 304 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 823 | Total Double Faults | 1614 |
| 1:31:53 | Average Match Time | 1:27:55 |
| 376.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.09 |
| 65% (10767/16486) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20428/31020) |
| 61% (6526/10767) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (12132/20428) |
| 46% (2646/5718) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4785/10592) |
| 48% (1096/2265) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1940/3930) |
| 48% (8010/16808) | Return Points Win % | 47% (14403/30732) |
| 58% (11/8) | Slam W/L | 54% (32/27) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 38% (21/35) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60% (6/4) |
| 52% (14/13) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (46/64) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (125/59) | Challenger W/L | 67% (158/78) |
| 66% (19/10) | Futures W/L | 78% (49/14) |
| 65% (166/257) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (310/527) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 44% (24/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (55/102) |
| 59% (43/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (97/172) |
| 89% (169/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (296/256) |
| 11% (169/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (296/39) |
| 20% (91/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (238/56) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
